<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stupid English Phrases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gazandkim.com/stupid-english-phrases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gazandkim.com/stupid-english-phrases/</link>
	<description>The Blog about Nothing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:33:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quinn</title>
		<link>http://www.gazandkim.com/stupid-english-phrases/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gazandkim.com/?p=28#comment-141</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the problem with idioms - if you rephrase them to be more truthful, they get less catchy. Perhaps there&#039;s some sort of mathematical relationship:

catchiness x truthfulness = constant

So possibly, if you&#039;re in search of the ultimate catch phrase, the process would be to gradually eliminate as much truth from it as possible ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the problem with idioms &#8211; if you rephrase them to be more truthful, they get less catchy. Perhaps there&#8217;s some sort of mathematical relationship:</p>
<p>catchiness x truthfulness = constant</p>
<p>So possibly, if you&#8217;re in search of the ultimate catch phrase, the process would be to gradually eliminate as much truth from it as possible <img src='http://www.gazandkim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
